Could a decision to scorn a humdrum south-east Queensland local government group be the catalyst that forces the glittering, shoot-from-the-lip Gold Coast to toe the line in 2023?

Itās not often Gold Coast Mayor Tom Tate finds himself standing on the outside looking in.
But thatās where Tate, who regularly finds himself the centre of attention as one of Australiaās highest profile mayors and unashamed mouthpiece for the countryās capital of fun, is stuck as preparations for the south-east Queensland Olympic Games gear up in 2023.
This unfamiliar territory is courtesy of the controversial decision ā supported by a super-majority of Gold Coast councillors at the time ā to pull the Gold Coast out of the Council of Mayors Southeast Queensland (COMSEQ) ahead of the Olympic host city announcement in July last year.
Itās a decision that now appears to have cost Tate ā and the Gold Coast ā a seat on the influential board of the organising committee for the 2032 Olympic Games.
And itās left a queue of Queensland political heavyweights lining up to accuse Tate of costing the city millions of dollars in infrastructure investment.
With COMSEQ membership, they say, thereās literally a room full of money ready to be rolled out across the region to set it up for the Olympic show. But no amount of work is going to get Tate through the door ā short of performing a humbling mea culpa and coughing up $350,000 to be allowed back in.
Itās a fascinating side-story in the long lead up to the 2032 Olympic Games to be hosted across south-east Queensland. Itās a story rich in petty politicking and personality power plays, especially between urbane Brisbane and its flasher, younger sibling, the Gold Coast. But itās one that may ultimately achieve what many thought impossible ā forcing the glittering, shoot from the lip Gold Coast back into the box, most humiliatingly under the whip of Brisbane.
On one hand Tate remains defiant, doubling down on his view that COMSEQ is a āteam batting ducksā when it comes to lobbying federal and state governments for city deals.
He insists membership of the group is a dud deal for the Gold Coast, and the tourism jewel of Queensland was only ever a part of the group to show it was a team player during the Olympic bid.
On the other, heās being pressured by councillors whoāve got the wobbles and want back inside the tent and access to the fistfuls of dollars itās supposed to provide.
As well, heās being swatted by a phalanx of Gold Coast federal MPs, led by Moncrieffās Angie Bell, who say itās Tateās fault the city is dipping out under the Federal and State Labor governmentsā dispensing of project funding, and heād better fix it.
āI will take the issue to full council for discussion when I have evidence that our city is missing out on project funding,ā Tate said just before Christmas.
āI will ask Council to rejoin COMSEQ the minute either COMSEQ or any state or federal politician can show me what project, or funding, our city is missing out on simply because we are not members.
āI donāt believe that is the case as funding for any project should be determined by a genuine need for that project, not on any councilās membership status to a non-statutory board,ā he said.
āMy question to all COMSEQ members is: what project has been lobbied for, secured, funded and delivered as a direct result of COMSEQ?ā
Heās also refusing to smooth the fractious relationship with Brisbane Lord Mayor Adrian Schrinner, whom heās labelled ācrassā and āarrogantā, and seemingly ājealousā of the Gold Coastās ability to attract the limelight.
āI think itās a bit of jealousy, like your little brother seems to get the limelight, then they get [the feeling] theyāre ugly sister,ā he said.
If he needed to punctuate the point, Tate told the ABC he refused to ākiss the arseā of Schrinner in order to secure a spot on the Olympic Games planning committee and thought the Gold Coastās experience and expertise as host of the 2018 Commonwealth Games alone should ensure it a seat.
While tempering the personal criticism, Tate has indicated the cities arenāt ā and are unlikely to be ā in lockstep during the long haul to the Games.
āOur relationship is fine. I am issue-based and will always focus on the issue, not personalities,ā Tate said as he headed into the Christmas break.
āI made comments regarding the Lord Mayor after he openly ridiculed our city at an SEQ Olympic luncheon in Brisbane. I wasnāt there but I believe his joke fell flat and once I heard of the criticism levelled at me for not attending the lunch, I responded accordingly. Like I said, Iāve moved on from that and Iām sure Adrian has too.ā
But the Gold Coast hasnāt moved on and from 2023, the biggest game in town will be access to the spend on major projects during the stateās preparations for the 2032 Olympic Games.
The first decision of the Gold Coast city council on whether it will pay $350,000 and humbly rejoin COMSEQ will be telling.
Ā
Want to see more stories from InDaily Qld in your Google search results?